CMG301 MOD 4 SLP Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

CMG301 MOD 4 SLP - Essay Example In addition, partnership agreements can help better realize goals such as a safe work environment, resolution of issues without litigation, timely completion, and minimum disruption to the environment, and achieve a more client-focused design with reduced errors and omissions (Galey and Pagrzeba 124). Capital Roofing Company, in addition to partnering with the owners of 123 First Street, Seattle, can also partner with roofing materials suppliers to better ensure reliability of pricing and supply during the lifetime of the project. Partnerships with providers of Roof Diagnostics services or Preventative Maintenance Programs, or Photovoltaic Systems and Green Roofing can also add value that the owners may desire, in order to reduce their carbon footprints or to save money in the long-run through efficiency gains. Haltenhoff, C. Edwin and Rita A. Gregory. â€Å"Partnering on Small Construction Projects.† Discussion. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management 127.4 (2001): 346-7. EBSCOhost. Web. 12 Sep.

Role component Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Role component - Essay Example rsities have formulated peer evaluation guidelines suited to the unique teaching situations existing within their departments, always with the acquiescence of faculty. The process of peer review is generally implemented in ways that are tied to individual career enhancement, as well as departmental objectives and institutional mission. Peers usually form the primary source of data for â€Å"content expertise†, an important component of the â€Å"teaching† role of the faculty. Assessment of this role component should be based on 3 qualities namely, currency, accuracy and inclusiveness. Agatucci et al. (1995), describe â€Å"content expertise† as â€Å"knowledge, preparation and understanding of subject† (p.6) and stipulate certain criteria for the same, including: (1) demonstration of a strong foundation in the content and skills of the subject being taught; (2) evidence to suggest that the instructor stays abreast of current knowledge and new developments in the subject matter field; (3) demonstration of the knowledge of applicability of subject matter to other disciplines; (4) evidence to suggest that the instructor makes effective use of appropriate library, multimedia, laboratory, technological and other resources, and (5) evidence to show that the instructor is willing to implement innovations, and to revise and refresh course content with contemporary knowledge. Thus, content expertise evaluation, in essence, determines the level of skills, competencies, and knowledge the instructor possesses in a specific subject area in which (s)he has acquired higher education, training, and /or experience. The minimum standard of performance for the above listed criteria should be: Criterion #1. The quality of content taught is a reflection of the instructor’s mastery of the subject. Therefore, an effective teacher should know the subject well enough to provide sound and illuminating answers to any questions that the best student might ask on the subject. And, also be